Held by
0
portfolios on TandT
Bookmarked by
0
users
Avg position size
—
of holders' portfolios
13F filers
1
institution
Market cap
$1.4B
85M shares
52-week range
$4.30 – $25.77
54% from low
Sector
BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS, (NO DIAGNOSTIC SUBSTANCES)
Exchange
NASDAQ
CS
Monte Rosa Therapeutics Inc is a clinical-stage biotechnology company that specializes in developing molecular glue degraders (MGDs), a class of small molecule drugs that leverage the body's natural protein destruction mechanisms to selectively degrade therapeutically-relevant proteins. Utilizing the QuEEN platform, the company employ artificial intelligence and proprietary experimental tools to identify target proteins for degradation by MGDs. The company has three programs in clinical development: MRT-6160, a VAV1-directed MGD for immune-mediated diseases; MRT-8102, a NEK7-directed MGD for inflammatory diseases driven by IL-6, and the NLRP3 inflammasome; and MRT-2359, a GSPT1-directed MGD for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
www.monterosatx.comNo one on the platform currently holds GLUE.
| Institution | Shares | Reported |
|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologiesas of 2026-03-31 | 379,100 | $6.2M |
No one on the platform has traded GLUE yet.
Click to see transaction details on SEC.gov. Form 4s cover trades by officers, directors, and 10%+ owners, due within 2 business days of the trade.
| Year | Est. revenue | Growth | Est. EPS | EPS range | Fwd P/E | # Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $48M | -64.6% | $-1.63 | $-2.48–$-0.32 | — | 5 |
| 2027 | $57M | +17.8% | $-1.86 | $-3.23–$0.63 | — | 5 |
| 2028 | $45M | -20.5% | $-2.16 | $-3.04–$-0.59 | — | 5 |
| 2029 | $123M | +172.0% | $-2.07 | $-7.16–$-0.00 | — | 1 |
Forward consensus · growth is YoY vs the prior fiscal-year estimate · Fwd P/E at the current price · source: Financial Modeling Prep
Beat consensus in 5 of the last 8 reported quarters
| Reported | Est. EPS | Actual | Surprise |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-06 | $-0.38 | $-0.43 | -13.0% |
| 2026-05-07 | $-0.28 | $-0.45 | -60.7% |
| 2026-03-17 | $-0.35 | $-0.54 | -53.6% |
| 2025-11-06 | $-0.37 | $-0.33 | +9.9% |
| 2025-08-07 | $-0.38 | $-0.15 | +60.2% |
| 2025-05-08 | $-0.00 | $0.57 | +21690.9% |
| 2025-03-20 | $0.02 | $0.23 | +1379.1% |
| 2024-11-07 | $-0.49 |
| $-0.29 |
| +40.8% |
| $473M |
| — |
| GERNGeron Corporation | $1.53 | -2.23% | $985M | — |
| MGTXMeiraGTx Holdings plc | $12.67 | -2.24% | $1.2B | — |
Source: Financial Modeling Prep · peers by sector/industry
$GLUE sits on solid support. Good buy area if you like it.
View on StockTwits ↗$GLUE Q2 + August corporate deck. Substantial new data. MRT-8102 vs IL-6: NEK7 degradation blocks inflammasome assembly. Ziltivekimab neutralizes one cytokine at the bottom of the cascade. Slide 38 is the cleanest separation in the deck. In human monocyte-derived macrophages, 8102 shuts down pyroptosis (SYTOX) and DAMP release (extracellular ATP) at low nM. Ziltivekimab and rilonacept are FLAT across the entire concentration range. Zero effect on either. Antibodies don’t stop the cell rupturing and spilling IL-1α, IL-18, calprotectin and cholesterol crystals into the plaque. That debris is the necrotic core. Slide 34: calprotectin feeds back to drive more NLRP3 assembly — a loop explicitly independent of IL-1/IL-6. No downstream antibody breaks it. 2/7 GFORCE-1 is fully enrolled AND fully dosed. Data 2H 2026. Four arms: the original 40mg (n~27) + placebo (n~9) already complete, plus two ADDITIONAL dose levels at n~27 each. 28-day dosing. Population is obesity (waist ≥40”M/≥35”F or BMI ≥30) with CRP 3–15 mg/L. Key detail most people missed: both added doses sit BELOW 40mg. They’re exploring down, not up — because Phase 1 showed max activity at the lowest dose tested. Next disclosure includes UNBLINDED safety plus expanded biomarkers: NEK7, IL-6, IL-18, fibrinogen, SAA, body weight, other CV risk markers. CRP sampled pre-dose, D1, D7, D14, D21, D28, D35. Purpose is to accelerate dose selection into GFORCE-2. 3/7 The Phase 1 base for context. 112 subjects. SAD 48, MAD 40, dosed 5–400mg. • ~80–90% NEK7 degradation at EVERY dose level, incl. 5mg • 78% hsCRP reduction in elevated-baseline subjects • Part 3 (40mg, n=24, wk4): 85% sustained hsCRP reduction, 94% of subjects to <2 mg/L from 6.3 baseline • 31% fibrinogen reduction — independent atherosclerotic risk factor • 55% reduction in endogenous plasma IL-6, below the CV risk threshold • ~80% inhibition of ex vivo IL-1β across 5–200mg Safety: no SAEs, no TEAE above grade 2. TEAEs 29% on drug vs 32% on placebo. Headache 9% vs 9%. 3-month cyno tox: NOAEL at highest dose tested = ~200–300x therapeutic index. CRP deepened wk1→wk4. No rebound. 4/7 NEW metabolic data (slide 41). Not previously disclosed. Cynomolgus obesity model, 77 days: • NEK7 MGD alone: −8.3% body weight • Semaglutide alone: −17.0% • COMBO: −23.4% DEXA: preferential central abdominal fat loss, lean mass spared. That’s the profile incretins get criticized for missing. Monkey, not human — be clear on that. But GFORCE-2 carries body weight, BMI, waist, liver fat and liver inflammation as exploratory endpoints. A metabolic/MASH read riding on a cardiology trial. Also new: 100mg achieved pharmacologically active CSF concentrations. 75% CSF IL-6 reduction in 2 subjects with elevated baseline while plasma IL-6 stayed low = CNS-specific effect. Second-gen CNS-optimized NEK7 MGD, IND H2 2026. 5/7 Indication selection was ranked, not hand-waved. GLUE scored NLRP3 activity across 470 diseases / 513,390 patient profiles / 900+ RNA-seq datasets. HS, ASCVD and gout topped it. HS (slide 60): IL-1β 14x and IL-18 4x elevated lesional vs perilesional. 8102 at 10nM cut IL-1β, IL-1α and IL-18 in ex vivo human HS explants, 3 donors. NLRP3:NLRP1 ratio rises with progression. GALAXY-1, ~160 pts, HiSCR75, H1 27. Gout: 8102 beats selnoflast on caspase-1 potency by roughly a log. Rabbit MSU model cut joint swelling and MSKUS pathology. Thesis = dissolve tophi WITHOUT triggering flares. GEMINI-1, ~40 pts, CKD 3-4 allowed — precisely where SOC is contraindicated. Q4 26/Q1 27. 6/7 MRT-6160 is now free optionality — and there’s a near-dated cash event nobody is modeling. GLUE’s external R&D on 6160 fell to $16K in Q2, from $1.5M. Novartis funds 100%. Sjögren’s Ph2a/b (NCT07737743) — N=344, ESSDAI at wk24, explicitly designed to select a Phase 3 dose. Registry start 8/27/26. Here’s the part: under the 2024 Novartis agreement, milestones begin ON Phase 2 initiation. That deal currently books ZERO revenue. Up to $2.1B in milestones + 30% US P&L + ex-US royalties. Ph1 was strong: >90% VAV1 degradation in T and B cells, >70 subjects, no SAEs, up to 99% inhibition of IL-2/IFN-γ/IL-17A. Novartis guides to MULTIPLE Ph2 starts in 2026. 7/7 Oncology delivered too. MRT-2359 + AR inhibitor in AR-mutant mCRPC: 5/5 PSA responses (2 PSA90, 3 PSA50), 2 RECIST PRs, 3 SD = 100% DCR. Median 5 prior lines, 83% prior taxane, 57% prior Pluvicto. MODeFIRe-1 Ph2 activated, first patient Q3. CCNE1 (MRT-55811) drove tumor regression in ovarian xenografts. IND 2027. Balance sheet: $626M, no debt, runway into 2029. ATM fully untouched. ~$350M in collaboration payments over 3 years, potential >$400M over the next 24 months across Novartis x2 and Roche. Risks, plainly: the pyroptosis and metabolic legs are preclinical. On hsCRP alone the deck concedes parity with IL-6 antibodies. R&D spend is guided to rise. NFD/DYOR
View on StockTwits ↗$GLUE filed its June 30, 2026 quarter results, releasing the Q2 2026 financials.
View on StockTwits ↗$GLUE — updating my thinking after going through everything the company has published. The July 31 drop was entirely a reaction to someone else’s failure. Novo Nordisk’s anti-inflammatory heart drug didn’t work, and GLUE fell almost 40%in sympathy. No GLUE data came out. Analysts barely moved their targets — Jefferies 31→30, Guggenheim 34→30, both still positive — while the stock fell 27%. That said, Novo’s failure does real damage to how management has been pitching this. They’d been selling it on a blood marker. That marker just got discredited. 2— what the drug actually does, in plain terms: Think of inflammation like a fire alarm chain. Novo’s drug shut off the alarm near the end of the chain. Didn’t help. GLUE’s pill works at the very start. It stops immune cells from bursting open in the first place. Why that might matter: when those cells burst, they die and spill debris into the artery wall. That debris is what builds the soft gunk inside a plaque that eventually ruptures and causes a heart attack. Live cells clean the mess up. Dead ones become the mess. So it’s less “reduce inflammation” and more “stop killing the cleanup crew.” 3— two things buried in the annual report that aren’t in any slide deck: 1. In a heart-inflammation animal study, GLUE’s pill beat an injectable antibody drug of the type already approved for that condition. 2. Ozempic partly does the same thing GLUE’s drug does — it turns down the same protein, by about half. And when they combined the two in monkeys, weight loss went from 17% to over 23%, with the fat coming off the belly and muscle preserved. That second one is a weight-loss angle sitting in a document almost nobody reads. 4— the parts of this company that have nothing to do with the failed heart trial: • A second drug fully licensed to Novartis — Novartis pays for the trials, GLUE keeps 30% of US profits, up to $2.1B in payments • A second Novartis deal signed last September: $120M paid up front, up to $5.4B possible • A Roche partnership on top of that • A cancer program with unusually clean targeting data, filing to start trials this year • A prostate cancer drug that hit in 5 of 5 patients with a specific mutation • Their discovery method was published in Science Roughly $610M in the bank, funded into 2029, no debt. 5— the honest bear case, and what I’m watching: The worry: their next big heart trial enrolls almost exactly the same kind of patients where Novo just failed. And the “protect the cleanup crew” idea has never actually been measured inside a real artery — not once, in any study. It’s a good theory with a hole in the middle. Watching Thursday: whether Novartis has started its trials, and whether they’ve changed the heart trial design. But the real tell is the gout study starting around year-end. Short, cheap, clear yes-or-no answer, and a similar drug already works there. Long. Not advice, do your own work.
$GLUE Hmm..using loosely related Novo Phase 3 Zeus results to scare out investors before some big positive news or something unrelated not good going on behind the scenes? One would have to look at all the raw data of the Zeus trial to see if anything relevant to GLUE but thinking an antibody's result translates to a molecular glue / degrader doesn't make sense to me. I'd like to critique Wedbush's reason for lowering price target by $10..
View on StockTwits ↗$GLUE https://anachart.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/1785765702_soc-img.jpg
View on StockTwits ↗$GLUE Q2 lands this week — release expected pre-market Thu 8/6, call Fri 8/7 9:30 ET. Consensus ~(–0.37) on ~$12.9M. Q1 revenue came in $4.2M vs $11M est — collab revenue from Roche/Novartis is lumpy by nature, don’t read that as an operating signal. The print isn’t the event. This is the first time management speaks since ZEUS. What I’m listening for: 1. Is GFORCE-2 in ASCVD still a 2026 initiation, or does the language soften? A clean pivot stated with conviction beats a hedge. 2. Does the H2 GFORCE-1 readout get reframed around IL-18 and IL-1β — the analytes ziltivekimab never touched — or another CRP waterfall? Both are already registered endpoints in NCT07119125. 3. Two differentiation points I’d want management to lean on: • In vitro (AHA 2025, Sa4063): head-to-head in stimulated hMDM, only MRT-8102 inhibited pyroptotic membrane permeabilization and IL-1α/IL-18 release. Ziltivekimab inhibited none of it. Preclinical, but it’s a direct comparison. • Clinical: 100mg achieved pharmacologically active CSF levels with 75% CSF IL-6 reduction in subjects whose plasma IL-6 was low. n=2, early — but a mAb doesn’t cross the BBB at all. That’s structural, and it’s the leg ZEUS can’t reach. 4. Everything else ZEUS didn’t touch: MRT-6160 VAV1 Phase 2 starts (Novartis, up to $2.1B milestones + 30% US P&L), MRT-2359 Ph2 in mCRPC after that 100% PSA response in AR-mutant, cyclin E1 IND guided H2. Warmuth guided three Phase 2 initiations this year. Whether that number holds — and which three — is the whole call. NFA / DYOR
View on StockTwits ↗$GLUE @CH_Expat 16 months ago was the time to buy many of these biotech's trading at a fraction of cash following on three bad events including tariffs unrest at the FDA and fear of major changes in the biotech sector was the time to buy. 1 yr later Some up 100 to 2000%. Now hard to find any trading below cash.
View on StockTwits ↗$GLUE More receipts. The more you post the worse it gets
View on StockTwits ↗$GLUE @oceanbleu - A few months ago, I would have tended to agree with you - this could be an opportunity because, as @Gurujoe pointed out GLUE MoA is completely different than Novo's. However as I posted months ago, I think using protein degraders / molecular glues to try to undue atherosclerotic calcification is foolish and reveals limited understanding of thermodynamics and the physiocochemical basis for ectopic calcification. Beyond that GLUE is in a down trend for the past few months, that transient low spike down to ~$14 several weeks ago, as I pointed out was not a good omen, and today it went below that to the 12's. Sure, some of it (the precipitous dropping of the bid on the Novo news is MM games. And this applies to many biotech stocks - now there are months worth of bag holders, tax loss season coming in 3 months, a war, exponential (not transitory!) inflation and many of these biotechs still up 100-1500% - lots of room below IMO.
View on StockTwits ↗Recent $TICKER stream from stocktwits.com — refreshed every 5 minutes. Sentiment tags are self-reported by posters. Not investment advice.