NNDM

Nano Dimension Ltd. American Depositary Shares

People who hold NNDM also hold

DDI

DDI

DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. American Depository Shares

2 co-holders · 100% overlap

GAMB

GAMB

Gambling.com Group Limited Ordinary Shares

2 co-holders · 100% overlap

BMBL

BMBL

Bumble Inc. Class A Common Stock

2 co-holders · 100% overlap

LNSR

LNSR

LENSAR, Inc. Common Stock

2 co-holders · 100% overlap

GGR

GGR

Gogoro Inc. Ordinary Shares

2 co-holders · 100% overlap

AMD

AMD

Advanced Micro Devices

1 co-holder · 50% overlap

GSL

GSL

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

2 co-holders · 100% overlap

SIRI

SIRI

Sirius XM Holdings, Inc

2 co-holders · 100% overlap

Ranked by collective conviction (sum of co-holders' % allocation) across public portfolios holding NNDM.

Recent trades on TradeandTell

• ZulleBUY1,200@ $1.40

  6/17/2026
  in Robinhood — Robinhood Roth Ira →
• ZulleBUY12,161@ $1.36

  6/17/2026

  Cash value + investments above MC, nearly a double even discounting all current unprofitable business lines. Activist investors seeking a return of value to shareholders in short term. Buying the outrage news on the strategic merger that will be voted down and cost the company 3% of their cash in breakup fees. Company trading at half their cash liquidation value.

  in THE DEEP END →

$NNDM chatter on StockTwits

• 
  Paul@P3K12Bullish8h

  $NNDM I am a definite yes vote. This will be better then the failed 3D printing tech that Nano got themselves out of. That is why Yoav Stern kept buying other companies. Murchinson had their chance. They already threw out One CEO and 3 board members. Screw them this is their mess. And they want to get rid of their replacements. Yoav Stern warned that Murchinson only wanted the money, many did not believe him. Now do you believe him? I am long term with new company. Murchinson will try to pry money away from retail investors. They are using Oramed Pharmaceuticals to get more voting power and cheap shares. Why would a small start up medical company with a market cap of 158 million have that much in a 3D printing company? They want the money. I don't want to get just a buck more a share. That is all we may get after Salaries m, taxes, and fees for Guggenheim Securities, LLC and Houlihan Lokey, Inc. They still will get payed.

  View on StockTwits ↗
• 
  Coco@CocoBoudin9h

  $NNDM more I read about epigenetic testing more I see it becoming MANDATORY for future insurance coverage and premium setting. This isn’t about pre-existing conditions, it’s about modifiable life style factors that can be reversed to avoid future chronic high cost conditions. There is so much ill health from ‘lifestyle’ modifiable factors such as smoking. Obesity, Type 2 diabetes, MASH, that it is literally not possible to simply give a free pass to keep going with the current system.

  View on StockTwits ↗
• 
  3333 Bundy@bundy333310h

  $NNDM Don't get me wrong, but before opting for a reverse merger I would have opt for IPOs of the business activities I do not want to consolidate anymore. Thus 3D Printing, AME, Essemtec AG. After having achieved that, I would start the transformation, if that would be the only way, to somehow survive as a going concern. I would never ever agree to a book value of Essemtec AG as being just 20M. That seems to me not even to be called 'a joke's but totally insane. But did they even sold AME for an upfront payment of roughly one single percent of the amount they had burnt into that 3D Printing/AME business? I wonder which status will have $NNDM as a (future) company, business and market cap from August, 1st 2026 on

  View on StockTwits ↗
• 
  3333 Bundy@bundy333311h

  $NNDM By today, more than 300 entries here at the NNDM board in June by @WolfStock18 Just to remember everybody on one from the beginning to decide:

  View on StockTwits ↗
• 
  Cam Lafram@WamBamLaFram11h

  $NNDM BOD, old CEO, and hedge funds want the cash so bad they can't see straight. Gave away all of the tech, instead of scaling it, but it's not too late.

  View on StockTwits ↗
• 
  Cam Lafram@WamBamLaFram11h

  $NNDM Where we are at is because of the old CEO, the activist hedgefund, and the new board. We still have the balance sheet and space tech. It's not over. We just need all 3 of those to stop trying to pursue the precious, and use it with the tech.

  View on StockTwits ↗
• 
  Cam Lafram@WamBamLaFram12h

  $NNDM Essemtec machines are used by $SPCX

  View on StockTwits ↗
• 
  Cam Lafram@WamBamLaFram12h

  $QTEX $NNDM Was on the edge of the 4th industrial revolution, and gave up their prized DragonFly, that was being merged into Essemtec's technology. They need to reunite, and combine the quantum and space tech, like the old CEO was working on for years.

  View on StockTwits ↗
• 
  Sam@Dew820h

  $NNDM if they bought back all shares on open market where would stock go .

  View on StockTwits ↗
• 
  Coco@CocoBoudin22h

  @OGLUCIDBULL are you able to see if this naked short selling is happening with $NNDM ? There are ‘activist’ investors who are connected with other large shareholders with about 1/3 of OS between them. Filings from one of the three (Ornamed) is making money by shorting the stock. The activist is an advisor and shareholder of that company. The stock price has been manipulated for years. It’s been an easy prey due to dysfunctional management.

  View on StockTwits ↗
• 
  John Vasago@PraetorianGuard1d

  $NNDM The top 7 Nano Dimension shareholders Murchinson Ltd. = 15,550,000 Oramed Pharmaceuticals = 15,079,708 STATE STREET CORP = 10,369,423 BOOTHBAY FUND MANAGEMENT, LLC = 7,775,000 AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL INC = 4,868,387 Man Group plc = 4,488,700 TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP = 2,527,890 Total = 60,659,108 shares We assume that all those shares will vote with Murchinson So we need 64,298,654 shares to be voting with Nano Dimension's management to win the EGM vote. That would be a total of about 124,957,762 shares voted. We got 56 million last AGM in 2025. 64,298,654 is 51.45% of the total voted shares. Looking at this, mathematically, it is possible however in reality it is very improbable that retail can win this.

  View on StockTwits ↗
• 
  3333 Bundy@bundy33331d

  $NNDM $1.35 down $71.35 (98.14%) All Time Seems a little bit late trying to start fighting for the remaining 2 percent left after having lost 98 percent according to stocktwits. And if this firm would have free cash available, why they didn't buy the medicine branch from QTEX while selling the AME platform to them

  View on StockTwits ↗
• 
  N@lessloss1d

  $NNDM 5 dollars a share is only 1b valuation .

  View on StockTwits ↗
• 
  THE WOLF@WolfStock181d

  $NNDM i am all in with you guys wanting change and a new sector but this deal make 0 sense. Its like giving a X company with 20 mil rev , a 890 mil valuation lol 😆 and then giving them all the cash so we nano shareholder become minority owners, loose every future votes. Infinite is only made of tru diagnostic and tally health. Nano can buy 10 companies like tally health for using half the cash 200 mil dollars. Imo cancel the fking deal and do that then nano value should be , 8 bil lol , now you get my point, it dont make sense guys. We need a good company with strong rev lets say 200 to 300 annual rev and is close to cash flow positive and needs cash to grow, i would be in for that. Or full sale of company. The financials of infinite will be a joke, just like how stehling hyped the excitement on announcing the reverse merger lol. Guy is a clueless pos. Lost all trust. Even a merger with DDD would be solid.

  View on StockTwits ↗
• 
  THE WOLF@WolfStock181d

  $NNDM the worst was when this scammers on mgmt sold AME for 2 mil. The assets it self and investory prolly cost more then that. The patents peoply are worth significant. Why they didnt sell all IP, patents and assets to a defense or aerospace company? That was a slap on our face by this crooks. I am telling you guys , look i am looking out for all of us. They sold an asset to a smaller company and help them out gain traction. Ame should've been sold for 100mil plus not 2 mil. If I knew they were selling ame for 2 mil I would paid them 2.1 mil and take it. Something is deff wrong here . I am very very happy ormaed is siding with murchison, we need their support here to cancel this fake scammy deal. this is not a change you want, nano should be 70% ownership not minority. It should be other way around. Just go online and do your research. Also why dont mgmt distribute ssys shares to us? They haven't done one thing good to maximize shareholder value yet.

  View on StockTwits ↗

Recent $TICKER stream from stocktwits.com — refreshed every 5 minutes. Sentiment tags are self-reported by posters. Not investment advice.