Held by
0
portfolios on TandT
Bookmarked by
0
users
Avg position size
—
of holders' portfolios
13F filers
0
institutions
Market cap
$7.5M
7M shares
52-week range
$0.87 – $7.92
4% from low
Sector
TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS (NO RADIOTELEPHONE)
Exchange
NASDAQ
CS
iQSTEL Inc is a technology company offering a wide array of services to the telecom and Internet industry. The business divisions of the company are Telecommunication including VoIP, SMS, International Fiber-Optic, Proprietary Internet of Things (IoT), and a Proprietary Mobile Portability Blockchain Platform; the Fintech division includes remittances services, top-up services, Master Card Debit Card, a USA Bank Account, and a Mobile App; Electric Vehicles division offers Electric Motorcycles and plans to launch a Mid Speed Car; and the Metaverse division includes Metaverse platform to access products, services, content, entertainment, information, customer support, and more in a virtual 3D interface. Geographically, it derives a majority of its revenue from the USA.
www.iqstel.comNo one on the platform currently holds IQST.
No tracked institution reports a position in IQST as of their last filing.
| Execution date | Ratio |
|---|---|
| 2025-12-15 | 1.01646-for-1 |
| 2025-05-02 | 1-for-80reverse |
| 2015-06-25 | 40-for-1 |
No one on the platform has traded IQST yet.
| Year | Est. revenue | Growth | Est. EPS | EPS range | Fwd P/E | # Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $421M | +24.9% | $-0.69 | $-0.69–$-0.69 | — | 1 |
| 2027 | $452M | +7.4% | $-0.11 | $-0.11–$-0.11 | — | 1 |
Forward consensus · growth is YoY vs the prior fiscal-year estimate · Fwd P/E at the current price · source: Financial Modeling Prep
Beat consensus in 0 of the last 4 reported quarters
| Reported | Est. EPS | Actual | Surprise |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-20 | $-0.12 | $-0.29 | -141.7% |
| 2026-04-06 | $-0.23 | $-0.39 | -69.6% |
| 2025-11-14 | $-0.41 | $-0.68 | -65.9% |
| 2025-08-18 | $-0.49 | $-0.81 | -64.0% |
| $12M |
| — |
| KRKR36Kr Holdings Inc. | $3.13 | +1.79% | $6M | — |
| PCLAPicoCELA Inc. | $6.34 | -3.94% | $6M | — |
Source: Financial Modeling Prep · peers by sector/industry
No recent Form 4 filings on EDGAR — either no insider transactions reported recently or this isn't a SEC-registered issuer.
$IQST @azgator (Paul Bowers) claims he has no connection to $IQST. Micorsoft Copilot seems to disagree. "Yes — Paul Bowers is publicly associated with iQSTEL, as he has posted on LinkedIn about iQSTEL’s work and its subsidiary Reality Border. In a LinkedIn post, Paul Bowers — identified as a B2B corporate branding specialist — announced that iQSTEL and its subsidiary Reality Border are pioneering new developments in the Meta Quest Lab LinkedIn. This indicates that he is actively involved in or connected to iQSTEL’s brand and product initiatives. While the LinkedIn post does not explicitly state his official job title or employment status, the fact that he is publicly promoting iQSTEL’s projects and is recognized in that context suggests he is working with or for the company. Such posts are typically made by employees or representatives of the organization. This public association strongly implies he is connected to iQSTEL, likely as an employee or representative." What a shock. Not.
View on StockTwits ↗$IQST Ladies and gents. I prefer investing in stocks that are backed heavily by institutions. I use this filter extensively when considering purchases made on the market. However, sometimes my dumb ass gets involved with an OTC stock because early in the game I believed that it would go somewhere upwards. Boy have I paid dearly to the management antics of Leandro and Alvaro in IQST!!!!!lol Regardless, my latest findings on Fintel on institutional involvement is as follows: https://fintel.io/so/us/iqst If you do the math so by dividing 295,263 by shares outstanding according to SEC FILING by IQST, your figure is 3.07% So 23 institutions are comprised at 3.1% currently. So if they begin to purchase more, SUPERCHUCK stepping in a wee bit more.
View on StockTwits ↗@Hootowl @AzGator @MrHamilton @Kingpapa36 I’m with you Hoot. That guy is so far down after the reverse split that he’s trying to salvage his losses. The reason being is that he continues to say “you must have lost money after the split” but if he’s still “holding his shares” as he continues to say that “he is bullish on this stock” then means he would be in the red, because nobody who bought shares years ago are in the green after the continuing downtrend of this horrible stock. And as for “only focusing on one stock” to put all ones time in one stock is not that great advice. Now mind you I only have 3 companies in my Roth IRA but those companies are my 10-15 year hold for when I retire, and they are all growth stocks with strong balance sheets. Now I may put another company in but if I do I am waiting DataBricks to go public. I wouldn’t buy it IPO day. I would wait for it to cool down then jump on it but this bum is tripping and trying to sell everyone a dream with $IQST.
View on StockTwits ↗@mountainman5050 @AzGator so two trolls actively patrolling $IQST board. I wonder why
View on StockTwits ↗$IQST - You really have to ask yourself why certain people attack me for simply reposting verified IQST information — straight from the company, straight from filings, straight from official updates. I’m not posting rumors; I’m not posting hype. I’m reposting accurate, current data because I believe in the company and always have. Yet the same people keep trying to deflect by dragging out old, irrelevant numbers — some of them even pre‑2025. Yes, even Q1 is old data at this point. They ignore the updated revenue run rate, the updated EBITDA, the updated guidance, and the updated acquisitions. So you have to ask: what’s their motive? Why attack someone sharing current facts while they recycle outdated information? And here’s the part they really don’t want to talk about — IQST has been, and still is, massively undervalued. A company projecting ~$560M revenue and ~$16–17M EBITDA trading at a ~$7M market cap isn’t “hype,” it’s mispricing. If you don’t like what I post, block me!
View on StockTwits ↗@AzGator @MrHamilton @EggyThomas @Kingpapa36 You're funny. Digging through a year of your posts and counting them took about a minute. Calculating percentages even less. "Serious traders focus on one stock when they’re doing real DD." Serious traders diversify; they don't focus on one stock for YEARS. Especially one with such a lousy track record as $IQST. Which means you are not a serious, or smart, trader. "You focus on IQST because you lost money" I have told you at least twice I MADE money on $IQST. Maybe you should write it down so you remember. So what are you? (1)Paid pumper, (2) on Leo's payroll, or (3) up to your neck in losses and trying to salvage some of your money? I' m guessing 2 or 3. You have been pumping $IQST for years and it has kept dropping. Even the most optimistic pumper would have moved on to better stock choices by now. Calling me a looser (spelled loser) means you have sunk to name-calling. A sure sign you have lost the debate.
View on StockTwits ↗$IQST -Ther once was a man that inspired me - His motto was simple: Watch your thoughts, for they become words. Watch your words, for they become actions. Watch your actions, for they become habits. Watch your habits, for they become character. Watch your character, for it becomes your destiny
View on StockTwits ↗$IQST - This inserted snippet is from your post below @AzGator - Here are my comments related to the snippet which are your words. My comments: Revenue has been good EBITDA has been horrific, negative Gross Margins are anemic, only 2.12% Net Margins are sickening and unsustainable -1.39% Half of the acquisitions have been ShitCos that Leo started, while another handful quietly disappeared. The company uplisted The company did a RS [80 for 1] If you think that's a good story, that's great. NOW I TOTALLY UNDERSTAND YOU AND YOUR ANALYSIS.
View on StockTwits ↗$IQST AZGator. What is your definition of a few? You say a few posters are angry for losing money since RS. Since RS SP has only gone down Few is factually everyone Only ones green are who recently bought off .87 low to current SP 1.15 Everyone else ( not a few ) have lost money since RS Once again not my opinion but actual fact. Few is everyone has lost money since RS because IQST just recently hit 52 week low
View on StockTwits ↗$IQST - Look out for the bitter loosers - You know who they are!
View on StockTwits ↗@Hootowl @AzGator here’s one of the trash stocks you are talking about. I seen it when I was scrolling through that Burch guy who kept pushing $IQST trash company.
View on StockTwits ↗$IQST - The negative views today are based on increased revenue while simultaneously lowering gross margin and increasing net losses. You only have to go back to the most recent quarter to see that. Please don't look back any further...you might just be horrified.
View on StockTwits ↗$IQST Just wanted to point out to any newbies on here tempted to buy this waste of a company to be wary of its cheerleaders. For example, I went back at looked at the last year of @AzGator 's posts. 108 total posts sine 8/8/2025. 105 of them were posts about $IQST. That's 97.2 %. 3 were posts about other stocks, one of which has a share price of $.00001. I scrolled down after I stopped counting and it looks like $IQST all the way down. Anyone else suspicious of a poster who focuses solely on one stock whose share price performance looks like this? Guessing either a paid pumper or actually on $IQST 's payroll. Use your own due diligence buying or selling any stock, and question everything you read.
View on StockTwits ↗$IQST - MACD Line: 0.00766 The MACD line for IQST today is 0.00766 — based on the most recent technical data returned in the search results. Interpretation: Buyers are gaining control; momentum has flipped positive.
View on StockTwits ↗Recent $TICKER stream from stocktwits.com — refreshed every 5 minutes. Sentiment tags are self-reported by posters. Not investment advice.