IESCF

$IESCF chatter on StockTwits

• 
  Monica Macez@TMStraderJul 27

  $IESCF $IESC Re:. Weekly BTC.X Cross reference the circles from the weekly BTC.X to the Wyckoff circle marker. I chose the weekly instead of the daily which means I'm still waiting for a leg down. Why? The bulls are relying on Trumpz but this decisionz he himself cannot make alone and processes take time especially when gov't decides to make a change. Changes aren't that quick for those governing cause changes can have negative consequences so they, as a group, would decide what those could possibly be, and if changed what challenges will affect the people of the world.

  View on StockTwits ↗
• 
  Monica Macez@TMStraderJul 27

  $IESCF Re:. Wyckoff Schematics Separation between camps will occur, and you'll need to decide which camp you will side with. The camp that sees the daily as done, then the Wyckoff schematics will be up. The camp that sees the weekly as not yet done, are likely in the belief of the weekly Wyckoff Schematics (even if those investors are not aware of the Wyckoff wave theory, they are bearish on this leg). You will know which camp I decided to choose, based on the images? I borrowed the Wycko chart but I added the circles to the WEEKLY BTC.X chart). Note:. The weekly BTC.X chart was borrowed as quick reference, but I will send my own Weekly chart later without the circles - distraction).

  View on StockTwits ↗
• 
  Monica Macez@TMStraderJul 16

  $IESCF Re:. BTC.X If a higher low off 53.7, then watch the 77 range.

  View on StockTwits ↗
• 
  Monica Macez@TMStraderJul 16

  $IESCF Re:. Time Analysis From July 7-12, I said if we already in the red, that the change on the range could be a low day which was the case but zi wasn't sure, cause the date could extend and I took a chance long on the 12th but never kept it expecting the extended time instead. Therefore, we are on watch for July 17th, being a retest date. This scenario is speculative, so let's say July 15th is a high day, and we consolidate,. It could be that July 17th (prolly from noon to did (?) is a failed retest. Be it a retest of the high that occurred today, or a failed retest of 73.7 (the high on July 15th or the high along 69-71.2 (?). At the fail. I expect a retest of the low 53, so watch afor a higher low, a db, or 52-50.

  View on StockTwits ↗
• 
  Monica Macez@TMStraderMay 3

  $IESCF Re:. MSTR I couldn't help myself ....I sold 2 bags from 1209 and 1211. I still have 2.

  View on StockTwits ↗
• 
  Monica Macez@TMStraderMay 3

  $IESCF Re:. MSTR I bought cost avrg again.

  View on StockTwits ↗
• 
  Monica Macez@TMStraderMar 17

  @Grand1000royal @Lincoln1962 $IESCF OMGosh, you said moron but not to me. Hahahaha

  View on StockTwits ↗

Recent $TICKER stream from stocktwits.com — refreshed every 5 minutes. Sentiment tags are self-reported by posters. Not investment advice.