Held by
0
portfolios on TandT
Bookmarked by
0
users
Avg position size
—
of holders' portfolios
13F filers
0
institutions
52-week range
$0.00 – $0.02
36% from low
Exchange
OTC Link
OS
Click rows below (any statement) to add/remove series. Selection stays as you switch tabs.
| 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $109.7K | $0 | $0 |
| Cost of revenue | $44.5K | $41.1K | $0 | $701 | $4.9K | $116.5K | $291.3K | $56.8K |
| Gross profit | −$44.5K | −$41.1K | $0 | −$701 | −$4.9K | −$6.8K | −$291.3K | −$56.8K |
| Gross margin | — | — | — | — | — | -6.2% | — | — |
| R&D | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Operating income | −$4.2M | −$1.3M | −$2.3M | −$5.1M | −$13.4M | −$2.6M | −$8.7M | −$5.6M |
| EBITDA | −$4.2M | −$1.2M | −$2.2M | −$2.0M | −$5.3M | −$2.5M | −$2.6M | −$4.2M |
| Net income | −$4.2M | −$1.2M | −$2.3M | −$5.3M | −$12.2M | −$3.3M | −$8.7M | −$5.5M |
| Net margin | — | — | — | — | — | -3040.2% | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | -0.01 | -0.00 | -0.00 | -0.01 | -0.02 | -0.00 | -0.00 | -0.00 |
Annual figures · source: Financial Modeling Prep
HELIUM ONE GLOBAL LTD
No one on the platform currently holds HLOGF.
No tracked institution reports a position in HLOGF as of their last filing.
No one on the platform has traded HLOGF yet.
| $35M |
| — |
| IBATFInternational Battery Metals Ltd. | $0.11 | -1.22% | $42M | — |
| KVGOFKavango Resources Plc | $0.01 | +0.00% | $36M | — |
Source: Financial Modeling Prep · peers by sector/industry
No recent Form 4 filings on EDGAR — either no insider transactions reported recently or this isn't a SEC-registered issuer.
$OTLK rest easy for morrow is another day of gains. Join me on the $HLOGF field for some real fun.
View on StockTwits ↗$HLOGF any positive news regarding farm-out for Rukwa and this goes above 1p. C'mon Lorna, show me the money!
View on StockTwits ↗$HLOGF My take: A year ago, Helium One was largely an exploration story. Today we have producing wells, a functioning processing plant, helium sales, an offtake agreement and ongoing CO₂ commercialization discussions. The market is still focused on whether the project works. I think that question is largely being answered right now. For me, the key question is no longer IF the stock goes higher, but whether production meets or exceeds expectations. That's the lever that matters now. Based on previous guidance, full plant capacity could be around 13 helium trailers per month. If upcoming updates show production moving toward that level, I believe the market will have to start valuing HE1 as a producer rather than an explorer. The first investor who sees 10-13 trailers/month won't be the last investor buying. Bullish. The next production updates could be far more important than most people realize.💥🧨🤝
View on StockTwits ↗$HLOGF sudden spike in volume today could mean news on the way
View on StockTwits ↗Helium One vs. Pulsar. I’ll repeat myself once again here: $PSRHF will incur losses because they still need a lot of capital, will have to dilute shareholders further, and are still far away from generating their first revenues. Helium One may appear more unstable at first glance, but they have started generating initial revenues this year. These now only need to be confirmed, and the project in Tanzania is making good progress. A major deal with a gas giant is emerging here, and $HLOGF may no longer need further dilution. They could already become profitable by 2027. I’ll post again in a few months to see whether I was right. Good luck to all investors.🤝💥🧨
View on StockTwits ↗$HLOGF In summary, I think 6-12 month mark is realistic IF successful. The market conditions are very strong given the recent events and surge in commodity value. The Tanzanian Government are already on board so that is another barrier out of the way. HE1 and PVE need to continue to show they can extract high volume, high quality helium from Rukwa. Looks like they will need to pump a lot of water for extraction. Without a partner this will be doomed for dilution.
View on StockTwits ↗$HLOGF 12–18+ months can occur when: Government approvals are slow or contentious The asset is in a jurisdiction with political or regulatory uncertainty Market conditions are weak (low commodity prices, capital discipline among majors) The farmor's expectations on valuation or retained interest don't align with market appetite
View on StockTwits ↗$HLOGF 6–12 months is more realistic for deals involving: Complex geology or frontier basins with limited analogues Multiple parties in the bid process Extensive due diligence requirements Negotiations over work program specifics, operatorship, or cost-recovery terms
View on StockTwits ↗$HLOGF I asked Claude AI for an idea of timelines for an early stage gas company to secure farm-out partner: 3–6 months is common for straightforward deals where the acreage is attractive, data rooms are well-prepared, and the regulatory environment is familiar to potential partners.
View on StockTwits ↗$HLOGF This is a true penny stock. I’m curious to see what me huge chunk of shares ever do.
View on StockTwits ↗Recent $TICKER stream from stocktwits.com — refreshed every 5 minutes. Sentiment tags are self-reported by posters. Not investment advice.