Held by
0
portfolios on TandT
Bookmarked by
0
users
Avg position size
—
of holders' portfolios
13F filers
1
institution
Market cap
$78.8M
10M shares
52-week range
$0.72 – $20.32
35% from low
Sector
PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS
Exchange
NASDAQ
CS
Click rows below (any statement) to add/remove series. Selection stays as you switch tabs.
| 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $211.8K | $410.9K | $328.8K | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Cost of revenue | $445.3K | $101.3K | $17.6K | $118.8K | $118.2K | $183.5K | $186.0K | $119.3K |
| Gross profit | −$233.5K | $309.6K | $311.2K | −$118.8K | −$118.2K | −$183.5K | −$186.0K | −$119.3K |
| Gross margin | -110.2% | 75.3% | 94.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| R&D | $2.1M | $1.1M | $3.3M | $17.9M | $13.3M | $4.8M | $2.9M | $3.7M |
| Operating income | −$5.1M | −$2.8M | −$6.4M | −$23.7M | −$18.4M | −$9.2M | −$7.0M | −$7.9M |
| EBITDA | −$4.8M | −$2.8M | −$6.3M | −$13.2M | −$17.4M | −$8.2M | −$6.0M | −$7.1M |
| Net income | −$5.0M | −$2.7M | −$6.4M | −$13.3M | −$17.5M | −$8.4M | −$6.2M | −$7.2M |
| Net margin | -2378.6% | -662.3% | -1935.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | -10.54 | -4.15 | -5.18 | -7.73 | -8.37 | -2.93 | -1.93 | -1.27 |
Annual figures · source: Financial Modeling Prep
| Year | Est. revenue | Est. EPS | EPS range | # Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $0 | $-1.94 | $-1.94–$-1.94 | 1 |
| 2027 | $19M | $-1.96 | $-1.96–$-1.96 | 1 |
| 2028 | $49M | $-0.93 | $-1.28–$-0.58 | 2 |
| 2029 | $10M | $-2.04 | $-2.04–$-2.04 | 1 |
Forward consensus · source: Financial Modeling Prep
Edesa Biotech Inc is a biotechnology company focused on inflammatory and immune-related diseases. It is involved in exploring novel ways to treat these diseases, including alternatives to topical steroids, which can have side effects. The company's product candidate, EB06, is an anti-CXCL10 monoclonal antibody candidate and is being developed as a therapy for vitiligo, a common autoimmune disorder that causes the skin to lose its color in patches. The other drug candidates in its product pipeline include EB05, EB07, and EB01 which are in their different phases of development.
www.edesabiotech.comNo one on the platform currently holds EDSA.
| Institution | Shares | Reported |
|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologiesas of 2025-09-30 | 25,000 | $61.8K |
| Execution date | Ratio |
|---|---|
| 2023-10-11 | 1-for-7reverse |
| 2018-05-07 | 1-for-7reverse |
No one on the platform has traded EDSA yet.
| $2M |
| — |
| EVGNEvogene Ltd. | $0.39 | -2.31% | $3M | — |
| IMNNImunon, Inc. | $1.79 | +4.07% | $5M | — |
Source: Financial Modeling Prep · peers by sector/industry
$EDSA Except, as we discussed the requirement was that the recipient was a member of the RRVP, which Edesa is not, yet. I do agree with BFLs post....JB data could come sooner than anyone thinks. Maybe within 12 months.
View on StockTwits ↗$EDSA BARDA ARDS Bull Case Part 2: The RPP solicitation asks for host-directed therapeutics to prevent progression to ARDS in hospitalized viral respiratory infection patients requiring supplemental oxygen, with a Phase 3 development plan supported by Phase 2 data. Minimum criteria include an active FDA IND for prevention of progression in viral pneumonia, clear relevance to influenza/viral respiratory infections, defined Phase 3 dose selection, and an FDA-aligned Phase 3 design with FDA feedback/concurrence. The solicitation contemplates roughly $40–50 million, one award, and a project start in Q4 FY26,
View on StockTwits ↗$EDSA US BARDA Bull Case: The PreventARDS RRPV RFP reads like it was created for Edesa. they absolutely must be THE top candidate here. And BARDA already has insights into their clinical performance at least in terms of how well they have executed on thier responsibilities in the current grant. The PreventARDS materials also point to a real late-stage program, not just a small grant. The RFI/sources-sought package says BARDA wanted input for host-directed therapeutics to prevent progression to ARDS in hospitalized viral-respiratory-infection patients, with emphasis on late-stage clinical development and long-term partnerships with multiple contractors. It also says the draft RPP would require a Phase 3 development plan, Phase 2 efficacy support, and preferably a product already in Phase 3.
View on StockTwits ↗$EDSA AKI bull case: If a drug reduced mortality by anywhere near the disclosed AKI subgroup result, pricing could be meaningful even in a hospital environment. At $15K–$30K per treatment course, a narrow U.S. population of only 25k–75k eligible severe ARDS/AKI patients at 40–60% penetration could support roughly $150M–$1.35B U.S. peak sales. If it expanded into sepsis-associated AKI or broader ICU AKI, the math can move into multi-billion-dollar peak sales territory.
View on StockTwits ↗$EDSA canadian NOC/c - paridiprubart is a perfect fit: Health Canada can allow a drug to be marketed earlier when there is promising evidence of clinical benefit for a serious, life-threatening, or severely debilitating disease, but the sponsor must commit to confirmatory studies and enhanced post-market obligations to verify the benefit.
View on StockTwits ↗$EDSA Part 3 Canada Government purchase / stockpile: • Canada has emergency preparedness and stockpiling mechanisms • Edesa has already framed EB05 as pandemic preparedness / biodefence relevant • Recent lobbying topics include procurement, Health Canada, ISED, biomanufacturing, and defence uses • If Health Canada supports a pathway, procurement discussions become more credible • Government purchase could be for preparedness/stockpile, not just normal hospital sales
View on StockTwits ↗$EDSA Part 2 Canada approval: • If Health Canada views the data as promising but wants more confirmation • Edesa could potentially pursue NOC/c • That is Canada’s conditional approval pathway • It can apply to serious/life-threatening diseases • Approval can be tied to confirmatory evidence • BARDA/general ARDS trial could become part of that support package • This could let Canada move faster than a traditional full approval path
View on StockTwits ↗$EDSA Canada bull case part 1: • They already have Phase 3 mortality data • ARDS is life-threatening with limited treatment options • Canada already backed EB05/paridiprubart with up to C$23M • The agreement was amended toward broader ARDS Potential Canada path: • Use existing Phase 3 data as the core clinical package • Engage Health Canada on biologic approval pathway • File through Canada’s NDS process • Seek Priority Review because ARDS is serious/life-threatening
View on StockTwits ↗$EDSA this was in 2015: https://gildehealthcare.com/news/venture-and-growth/am-pharma-signs-600-million-acquisition-option-with-pfizer/
View on StockTwits ↗$EDSA what’s interesting $8 dosent excite us ole school investors. Neither does $10. Now $15-20 is pretty cool. But we want $30-$50!
View on StockTwits ↗Recent $TICKER stream from stocktwits.com — refreshed every 5 minutes. Sentiment tags are self-reported by posters. Not investment advice.
Click to see transaction details on SEC.gov. Form 4s cover trades by officers, directors, and 10%+ owners, due within 2 business days of the trade.