Held by
0
portfolios on TandT
Bookmarked by
0
users
Avg position size
—
of holders' portfolios
13F filers
1
institution
Market cap
$77.1M
78M shares
52-week range
$0.76 – $3.31
9% from low
Sector
BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS, (NO DIAGNOSTIC SUBSTANCES)
Exchange
NASDAQ
CS
Cardiff Oncology Inc is a clinical-stage biotechnology company advancing cancer treatments focused on PLK1 inhibition, a validated oncology target with practice-changing potential. Its main asset, onvansertib, is a specific, oral PLK1 inhibitor currently being evaluated in a Phase 2 trial for first-line treatment of RAS-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), addressing a large, underserved patient population with high unmet need. Onvansertib is also under investigation in other PLK1-driven cancers through ongoing investigator-initiated trials and has shown robust single agent clinical activity in hard-to-treat tumors. By targeting tumor vulnerabilities, to overcome treatment resistance and deliver improved clinical outcomes for patients.
www.cardiffoncology.comNo one on the platform currently holds CRDF.
| Institution | Shares | Reported |
|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologiesas of 2026-03-31 | 101,253 | $164.0K |
| Execution date | Ratio |
|---|---|
| 2019-02-20 | 1-for-6reverse |
| 2018-06-04 | 1-for-12reverse |
No one on the platform has traded CRDF yet.
$CRDF One wise man. This lawsuit Is Indeed Ridiculous. We've had enough.🥱
View on StockTwits ↗$CRDF Here's a good poll question. Was it really NMS's intention to take back the molecule OR was it their intent to strong arm CRDF into economic concessions and dispute/negotiation spiraled into what it is today? We can't know for sure but it will materially impact negotiations if/when PI is granted. Curious to know what people thing.
View on StockTwits ↗$CRDF someone trying hard to keep this down. Probably with options expiration next week they can play with it
View on StockTwits ↗$CRDF PI decision will get released this week. Today or tomorrow
View on StockTwits ↗$CRDF Perhaps that's already happening - a proxy war with 2 large pharmaceuticals simply using CRDF and NMS as shells to fight over Onvansertib. You'd have $PFE using CRDF and $RHHBY using NMS via the NMS China/Roche Accelerator.
View on StockTwits ↗$CRDF this ridiculous lawsuit can end so fast if big pharma partners with crdf. Big pharma legal team and finances will immediately bully NMS to settle for less. This legal dispute only benefits the lawyers, whom also should be ashamed of themselves for playing the game and pulling on any lever they can to drag this out until someone surrenders. There are real people suffering today that could benefit from this therapy of the data holds up in the phase 3 trial but yet here we are wasting time because both legal teams cant come to a quick compromise or resolution so while their pockets grow, people are dying
View on StockTwits ↗$CRDF I want to explain something that seems to be confusing some of us. I'm pretty confident that I wrote this correctly: Think of this litigation as having two intertwined tracks: Track 1 The whole lawsuit Cardiff’s original Complaint May 19 (Filing 1) and then Amended Complaint July 17 (Filing 49) set out its claims against NMS: e.g., disputes over license termination, inventorship, continuation applications, and requested declaratory and injunctive relief. NMS’s Answer(s), Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims (Filings 36 June 26 and 63 August 3) set out NMS’s opposing view and its own claims against Cardiff. This track ultimately leads to summary judgment motions, potential trial, and final judgment on who breached, what the contract means, and what permanent relief is appropriate.
View on StockTwits ↗$CRDF Parties appear to be moving towards a settlement, likely announced after close on August 21 (op-ex). I would then expect a detailed readout of the Phase 2, update on most recent mPFS and projection, along with a discussion on P3 funding/partner.
View on StockTwits ↗Recent $TICKER stream from stocktwits.com — refreshed every 5 minutes. Sentiment tags are self-reported by posters. Not investment advice.
Click to see transaction details on SEC.gov. Form 4s cover trades by officers, directors, and 10%+ owners, due within 2 business days of the trade.
| Year | Est. revenue | Growth | Est. EPS | EPS range | Fwd P/E | # Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $244000 | -46.4% | $-0.68 | $-0.80–$-0.43 | — | 6 |
| 2027 | $189286 | -22.4% | $-0.82 | $-0.92–$-0.59 | — | 5 |
| 2028 | $230000 | +21.5% | $-1.13 | $-1.40–$-0.74 | — | 6 |
| 2029 | $102M | +44033.7% | $-0.67 | $-1.15–$-0.21 | — | 3 |
Forward consensus · growth is YoY vs the prior fiscal-year estimate · Fwd P/E at the current price · source: Financial Modeling Prep
Beat consensus in 4 of the last 8 reported quarters
| Reported | Est. EPS | Actual | Surprise |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-11 | $-0.12 | $-0.14 | -17.0% |
| 2026-05-14 | $-0.13 | $-0.18 | -38.5% |
| 2026-02-24 | $-0.18 | $-0.11 | +38.9% |
| 2025-11-06 | $-0.20 | $-0.17 | +15.0% |
| 2025-07-29 | $-0.19 | $-0.21 | -10.5% |
| 2025-05-08 | $-0.19 | $-0.20 | -5.3% |
| 2025-02-27 | $-0.26 | $-0.21 | +19.2% |
| 2024-11-07 | $-0.27 |
| $-0.25 |
| +7.4% |
| $1.6B |
| — |
| IPHAInnate Pharma S.A. | $2.54 | +2.63% | $238M | — |
| MISTMilestone Pharmaceuticals Inc. | $1.07 | -4.89% | $133M | — |
Source: Financial Modeling Prep · peers by sector/industry