Held · Bookmarked
0 · 0
portfolios · users
Avg position size
—
of holders' portfolios
13F filers
1
institution
Market cap
$67.1M
21M shares
52-week range
$1.77 – $7.39
20% from low
Sector
SERVICES-VIDEO TAPE RENTAL
Exchange
NASDAQ
CS
Borrow rate
0.41%
Easy to borrow
Click rows below (any statement) to add/remove series. Selection stays as you switch tabs.
| 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $53.5M | $39.3M | $31.4M | $56.1M | $68.0M | $49.1M | $78.2M | $65.7M |
| Cost of revenue | $16.1M | $17.1M | $16.1M | $20.9M | $36.4M | $19.1M | $38.8M | $36.6M |
| Gross profit | $37.4M | $22.1M | $15.3M | $35.2M | $31.7M | $30.0M | $39.4M | $29.1M |
| Gross margin | 69.9% | 56.4% | 48.7% | 62.7% | 46.5% | 61.1% | 50.4% | 44.3% |
| R&D | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Operating income | −$5.6M | −$4.3M | −$13.5M | $1.0M | −$6.4M | −$1.7M | $7.9M | −$12.6M |
| EBITDA | $8.1M | $2.2M | −$52.2M | $6.4M | −$4.5M | −$16.4M | $12.0M | −$6.6M |
| Net income | −$16.2M | −$14.7M | −$62.8M | $2.2M | −$9.7M | −$21.4M | $3.6M | −$8.8M |
| Net margin | -30.3% | -37.5% | -199.9% | 3.9% | -14.3% | -43.6% | 4.6% | -13.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | -8.56 | -6.70 | -9.89 | 0.20 | -1.13 | -1.78 | 0.16 | -0.49 |
Annual figures · source: Financial Modeling Prep
| Year | Est. revenue | Est. EPS | EPS range | # Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | $114M | $-0.13 | $-0.13–$-0.12 | 1 |
| 2028 | $131M | $0.15 | $0.15–$0.15 | 1 |
Forward consensus · source: Financial Modeling Prep
Cineverse Corp is a main streaming technology and entertainment company. Its core business operates as a portfolio of owned and operated streaming channels with enthusiast fan bases; a large-scale aggregator and full-service distributor of feature films and television programs; and a proprietary technology software-as-a-service platform for over-the-top (OTT) app development and content distribution through subscription video-on-demand (SVOD), dedicated ad-supported (AVOD), ad-supported streaming linear (FAST) channels, social video streaming services, and audio podcasts. It generates revenue from streaming and digital, Base distribution, Podcast and other, and Other non-recurring.
www.cineverse.comNo one on the platform currently holds CNVS.
| Institution | Shares | Reported |
|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologiesas of 2026-03-31 | 120,096 | $288.2K |
| Execution date | Ratio |
|---|---|
| 2023-06-09 | 1-for-20reverse |
| 2016-05-10 | 1-for-10reverse |
No one on the platform has traded CNVS yet.
| $70M |
| — |
| NIPGNIP Group Inc. | $0.27 | -2.87% | $8M | — |
| RDIReading International, Inc. | $1.33 | +4.72% | $47M | — |
Source: Financial Modeling Prep · peers by sector/industry
Trading at 0.6× sales vs its 0.5× historical median P/S.
Fair value ≈ $2.72 · price $2.88 today
Fair-value line = the stock's median historical P/S × sales per share. Price below the orange line = cheap vs its own history; above = expensive. Not investment advice.
Click to see transaction details on SEC.gov. Form 4s cover trades by officers, directors, and 10%+ owners, due within 2 business days of the trade.
$CNVS From up .27 today to down .27, a .54 cent swing, it’s a big deal on a $3 stock.
View on StockTwits ↗$CNVS When the price action doesn’t add up, I stop treating it as random. Maybe it’s coincidence. Maybe it’s just hedging. But if the so-called long-term convinced investor is economically positioned against the same rallies retail is buying, that would explain a lot... then shareholders are not aligned: they are being used as liquidity. And that explains the Courage and conviction pumping and confusing articles' timing. Maybe it’s legal. Maybe it’s standard convertible behavior. But it is not the same thing as long-term conviction. The business may be improving, but the stock is still trading like the capital structure is in control. That means I need to adjust my strategy accordingly. Stay tuned. GL
View on StockTwits ↗$CNVS @CineverseCorp Next time, just ask me for the money. At least I wouldn't hedge against you.
View on StockTwits ↗$CNVS If the investor who financed the company is economically hedging around the conversion while retail keeps buying the "long-term conviction" story, then shareholders deserve a clear explanation. Because creating enterprise value is one thing. Creating shareholder value is another. And if every rally is met with another wave of structurally incentivized selling, then the market isn't pricing the business anymore, it's pricing the capital structure. At this point, Courage & Conviction has lost a lot of credibility in my eyes.
View on StockTwits ↗$CNVS Here's what I can't reconcile. Management described raising capital from a "long-term, convicted investor." That investor has been identified as Kauffman, while the Courage & Conviction articles were encouraging retail to view this as a long-term compounder. Now look at the numbers. • Total convertible notes: ~$13M • First mandatory conversion window opens this week. • Maximum forced conversion: 15% = ~$1.95M. • At a $2.X conversion price, that's roughly 975,000 shares. Now compare that with recent market data. Until recently, reported short interest was around 470k shares. Over the past few sessions, another ~500-600k shares have been borrowed. 470k existing shorts + 500-600k newly borrowed = roughly 1 million shares. Almost identical to the size of the first mandatory conversion tranche. Is that definitive proof? No. Is it an interesting coincidence? Absolutely.
View on StockTwits ↗$CNVS bafoon!!!! Says he was calling for 12 before analysts & now he cries wolf?????
View on StockTwits ↗$CNVS fin sun crybaby keep asking market for more capital? one down day & he cries then dont reload next time!!!
View on StockTwits ↗$CNVS fin sun made no mention of management on friday in fact he was looking for 3.70 now it comes down & management is in question ok but now managemebt has a question for him are you in or out?
View on StockTwits ↗$CNVS @CineverseCorp Great business execution means very little if every breakout is met with another wave of supply. Long-term shareholders have been patient for years. At some point, the market needs confidence that the dilution overhang is behind us, otherwise every rally becomes an exit opportunity instead of the beginning of a rerating. Anyone can build a bigger company if they keep asking the market for more capital. The real test of capital allocation is creating meaningful per-share value for existing shareholders, not simply growing revenue while expanding the share count. That's the question serious investors should be asking.... Growing revenue with shareholders' money is the easy part. Growing per-share value is what separates great management teams from average ones. Which are you?
View on StockTwits ↗$CNVS Brazil won .......should be cheering vinny on ... real madrid channel ....... oh wait ......... 0 engagement now
View on StockTwits ↗$CNVS The angle of the dangle is directionally proportional to the mass of the ass .
View on StockTwits ↗$CNVS Just when I thought we were making a recovery late, a big drop at the end.
View on StockTwits ↗Recent $TICKER stream from stocktwits.com — refreshed every 5 minutes. Sentiment tags are self-reported by posters. Not investment advice.