No price history available for this symbol yet.
Held by
0
portfolios on TandT
Bookmarked by
0
users
Avg position size
—
of holders' portfolios
13F filers
0
institutions
No one on the platform currently holds 9888.
No tracked institution reports a position in 9888 as of their last filing.
No one on the platform has traded 9888 yet.
Consensus-seeded revenue, margins, and exit multiples. This is a scenario tool, not investment advice.
Analyst estimates unavailable for this ticker.
No recent Form 4 filings on EDGAR — either no insider transactions reported recently or this isn't a SEC-registered issuer.
$CCO.TSX Production setbacks at Cigar lake will hurt the next ER. Under $100
View on StockTwits ↗
@dan12345678 Showing longest, deepest trend-following strategy for$NTR.TSX and $CCO.TSX Entry on close above 100EMA ✅ and exit on close 4ATR below 100EMA (read that again). So, all still good... but mind the exit, and always mind the exit like a goalie or a keeper minds the net. Hope this helps
View on StockTwits ↗$CCO.TSX this thing will tank with output down and maintenance problems at Cigar Lake$90
View on StockTwits ↗
$CCO.TSX Selling a cash secured put may be a good way to add.
View on StockTwits ↗
$CCJ $CCO.TSX Cameco Another strong confirmation of the high-vol pattern — and this one's especially striking because everything except the widest exit was actually a losing strategy. VEnv1 alone, VEnv2@0, and even VEnv2@1.0 all posted negative or near-zero PnL, and it takes until VEnv2@4.0 to flip into genuinely strong territory (222.8% PnL). That's the first grid where the tighter half of the range was outright unprofitable, not just "worse." The DD shape is unusual too — it actually rises through the middle (30% → 41% → 48% at VEnv2@0/1/2) before falling back at 3.0 and 4.0 (43.8% → 36.1%). That's a hump, not the steady climb you saw on most other names — worth noting since it means the widest setting here isn't just the highest-PnL option, it's also risk-reducing relative to the middle of the grid, which is a genuinely good combination. Running tally of high 50 day 4.5%+ ATR% names now: $HBM (5.0%), $CLS.TO (7.0%), $TRI.TSX (4.7%), and now $CCO.TSX (4.6%) have all landed on VEnv2@4.0 as the clear best — four in a row with zero exceptions. That's a strong enough pattern that "VEnv2@4.0 for anything above ~4.5% ATR%" is looking less like a hypothesis and more like a settled finding at this point, especially compared to how much more scattered your Low/Medium-vol results have been. So, basically we are running a 1 x 10 day wide ATR band around 20EMA called VEnv1 (in green) and a 4 x 50 day wide ATR band (only below) called VEnv2 (Orange line) as the exit or stop limit, which mat also be used when position sizing. Not a recommendation, just my observation ... do like that bounce though
View on StockTwits ↗$CCO.TSX Anyone care to shine some light how this magnificent Company has lost 25% of its share value in the past 2 months?
View on StockTwits ↗
$CLF what's next ? $AA $ALB $CCJ $CCO.TSX
View on StockTwits ↗
$CCO.TSX $CCJ what -$9.52 ......someone explain it like I'm 5 please
View on StockTwits ↗Recent $TICKER stream from stocktwits.com — refreshed every 5 minutes. Sentiment tags are self-reported by posters. Not investment advice.